Friday, December 24, 2010

Police Release Surveillance Video of Man With Suitcase Containing Woman's Body

Here's the surveillance video we mentioned earlier, of a man transporting a suitcase that contained a woman's body. The woman was found in front of 435 East 114th Street on December 22 at 12:15 a.m., and was pronounced DOA. It's been determined that she was a 20- to 30-year-old black woman, and that her death by asphyxiation was a homicide.


Anyone with information is asked to call the NYPD's Crime Stoppers Hotline at 800-577-TIPS. All calls are strictly confidential.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Tales From a Greenpoint Christmas Tree Vendor

?Selling Christmas trees in New York City seems like a hard job. It's cold, for one. New Yorkers have that "reputation" for being tough customers and not always the friendliest, not to mention bargain hunters par excellence. And sitting outside a tree stand on an otherwise deserted street during the wee hours of the night shift sounds lonely, if not a bit scary. So what would ever possess a person -- with a full-time job no less -- to start selling Christmas trees?

Charlie Poekel, a Greenpoint resident who works a day job at a documentary film company, had for years been interested in the tree vending business. "A couple years ago, my roommate and I were trying to get a tree in Greenpoint at the stand across from Matchless," he told us. "We went down at 11 at night and asked what time they closed. They actually don't close because they don't lock up the trees. I thought, Wow, this is such a unique job. I starting asking questions, and the next year, I went to a few more stands and asked some more questions. As a job, there's really nothing like it."

After volunteering at a couple of Greenpoint stands, Poekel decided to open his own this year, at a spot on the corner of Nassau and North Henry, across from McGolrick Park. This made for a marathon Thanksgiving Day (the vending season runs from Black Friday to Christmas), including a trek to pick up the trees, 8 hours of loading and unloading, a 30 minute break for Thanksgiving dinner, and then hours more to get back to Brooklyn and set up the stand. "By 6 a.m. we were finished, and then I kept going to work the first shift," he said.

The stand operates with two shifts, 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., and 10 p.m. to 10 a.m. Poekel is there mornings, evenings after his day job ends, and on weekends. His rotating staff of employees -- friends who live in the neighborhood who are musicians, photographers, or between jobs -- sit in at the other times.

?"The hardest part was trying to decide what trees to get and how many and what sizes," he said. "Turns out, we sell a lot of trees to first-time tree buyers. The couples or people who haven't had a tree in quite some time, like since they were kids -- they usually start small. There aren't many people who get a 10-footer."

Price is dependent on height, the tree itself, and any "flaws," like a bald spot or weird top. Due to a law passed in the '30s by the New York City mayor, as long as you don't obstruct sidewalk traffic, you don't need a permit -- just permission from whomever owns the property upon which you're setting up. Poekel brought in an RV to give his employees an escape from the cold. Bathrooms, however, mean a trip to a nearby bar or, he said, "I'll leave that to your imagination."

Stories tend to accumulate over the years, told from vendor to vendor, some of them real, some of them with the trappings of urban legend. "There's one I heard from a tree guy," he said. "Someone new was selling trees late one night. A good-looking girl came around, talked to him for 30 minutes or so, got him to sneak away, and gave him head in a nearby alley. When he came back, the story goes, every tree was gone."

In another tale, "This woman sold a tree to a drunk guy three nights in a row. The first two nights the tree apparently didn't make it home."

For Poekel, the best part of the job is the people, and the neighborhood spirit the stand creates. "Kids love every tree in there; I could show them the Charlie Brown tree, and they'd love it," he says. "Also, 90 percent of tree-vending jobs are worked by out-of-towners. I have nothing against people who come from out of town to do this, but most of that money is just leaving the city. There was something admirable in my mind about having locals working the stand. People think of New York as this cold city where you don't give a stranger the time of day. But there's a woman who brings us wine twice a week, and people bake cakes and bring hot cocoa and cider. People see me in the street and are like, 'Hey, you're the Christmas tree guy!'"

Some stands can be extremely lucrative, selling more than 1,000 trees in a season. Poekel's first year meant a lot of first-time operating costs, so it remains to be seen whether he'll make a profit, but either way, he says he'll be there again next year: "A little kid smiling and asking if you work for Santa can just make your day."

The last day to buy trees is Christmas Eve, so if you're still in the market, head over, say hi, and pick one up.

[JDoll]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Robbie McEwen Signs with Team RadioShack

Cycling News

Robbie McEwen Signs with Team RadioShack

By AP
Dec 23, 2010 - 6:09:30 PM

Australian cycling star Robbie McEwen will make his debut for Lance Armstrong's Team RadioShack at next month's 2011 Tour Down Under, the first event of the 2011 ProTour season.

McEwen joins an already strong lineup that includes seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong, competing in the Australian race for the third straight year, and former Swiss national champion Gregory Rast.

"McEwen has won more stages of our race than anyone else and is a big favorite with the fans," race director Mike Turtur said.

The 38-year-old McEwen has won 12 stages on the Tour de France and is a three-time winner of the Tour's green jersey as top sprinter.

The 2011 Tour Down Under will be raced in South Australia from January. 16-23.

Related articles

Robbie McEwen Signs with Team RadioShack - Dec 23, 2010 - 6:09:30 PM
Team RadioShack Fined for Tour de France Black Jersey Stunt - Oct 29, 2010 - 2:58:33 PM
Team RadioShack Signs Philip Deignan and Nelson Oliveira - Oct 12, 2010 - 7:33:47 AM
Team RadioShack Asks CAS to Arbitrate After Non-Invite to 2010 Tour of Lombardy - Sep 10, 2010 - 4:18:43 AM
Team RadioShack Signs Three New Riders for 2011 - Sep 3, 2010 - 3:52:42 PM
Team RadioShack's Haimar Zubeldia Fractures Wrist - Jun 7, 2010 - 12:04:49 PM
Bruyneel Set to Lead Team RadioShack - Feb 13, 2010 - 6:02:09 AM
Team RadioShack Releases Sneak Preview Photo of 2010 Team Jersey - Dec 8, 2009 - 8:15:12 AM

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Wavy Gravy Gets Clobbered at MSG

?Clip Job: an excerpt every day from the Voice archives.
August 12, 1971, Vol. XVI, No. 32

Who clubbed the clown?
By Ron Rosenbaum

Wavy Gravy, recovering from amoebic dysentery, tropical fever, opium addiction, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and a severe spinal condition, was out of Roosevelt Hospital on a special pass when someone clubbed him at Madison Square Garden. Of course whoever clubbed him -- Wavy thinks it was a Garden security cop -- had no way of knowing about the amoebic dysentery, tropical fever, opium addiction, pneumonia, or tuberculosis. But he did know about Wavy's spine. When a city cop told him to "start running" Wavy told him, "I've got a spinal fusion here and I can't run." Wavy pointed to the spot in his back where the operation had been performed. Then a cop standing behind Wavy clubbed him right there where the operation had been performed. Wavy collapsed.

* * *

The whole thing began at 1 o'clock Sunday afternoon when Wavy got out of that bed, painted his teeth red white and blue, put on his flowing multi-colored patchwork robe, drew on his jester's cap with its point drooping over the side of his head, removed the silver Nepalese lama's ring with the tiny Donald Duck toy hanging by one webbed foot from it out of the mouth of his blue-eyed stuffed baby yak under his arm, walked out the ground floor lobby past the widened eyes of Joe Colombo bodyguards and well-wishers and took a cab to Madison Square Garden.

Wavy was headed for the Garden because he thought the people running the George Harrison Bangla Desh benefit wanted Wavy to help out with crowd security. Wavy is probably the single most talented crowd handler in the world because Wavy is a marvelous combination of Tibetan lama and Donald Duck, a charming childlike clown and a sophisticated Gandhian. He is less a crowd "handler" than an adept at getting people to handle themselves...

Like the best of clowns, Wavy Gravy -- who started out the '60s as Hugh Romney, Village poet and comic, and turned into a Merry Prankster, before becoming Wavy Gravy of the Hog Farm -- like the best of clowns, Wavy will make as big a fool of himself as is necessary to make a wiser man of you...

But Wavy and his Hog Farm have been away from this country for 10 months, traveling from Paris to Nepal overland, after the notorious Warner Brothers "Caravan of Love" disintegrated in London...

Wavy was excited about helping out because he and the Hog Farm had been on the way to Bangla Desh to help the flood victims, collecting food and medicine and calling their traveling caravan "Earth People's Stomach," when the Pakistani civil war broke out preventing their entry into Bangla Desh. Wavy decided to head north for Nepal and got involved in a project building playgrounds and distributing toys and medical supplies to isolated villages in the Himalayas...

It wasn't until the second show had already begun about 9.30 that night that someone sent a ticket down for Wavy. At last, ticket in one hand, yak in the other, Wavy rushed into the lobby, entering just in time to be run over by the small-scale riot that erupted outside the doors.

Shortly before Wavy stepped into the lobby a crowd of 200 people without tickets had charge the glass doors to the Garden, breaking through with a police barricade. A force of about 100 Garden security cops and city police had massed behind the doors and charged the crowd. Witnesses report clubbings as the crowd ran. Wavy didn't run. He showed his big red ticket to a New York City cop. He said: "I've got a ticket."

"Take your ticket and shove it up your ass," the cop said. Wavy tried to talk but the cop immobilized him with a rolled-up newspaper under his chin, whacked him with the paper club, and told him to start running. That's when Wavy remembers being clubbed from behind. Wavy didn't see the face of his assailant -- he is asking any eye witnesses to get in touch with him -- but as he was lying on the floor clutching his yak, Wavy says he heard a New York cop yelling at the guy who clubbed him. "The city cop was freaked that the guy had gone berserk on me," Wavy recalls.

...Wavy is on methadone for the opium addiction in addition to Demerol for his newly re-injured back, but he says he is "hopping mad." "You know, I almost never get mad at anything, but I'm hopping mad now. We gotta stand our ground against these cretins until they listen."

The "cretins," Wavy explains, are the people who think security at rock events can be handled only squads of musclemen...

Mr. Tom More of Madison Square Garden has said that Wavy Gravy was not clubbed at all, that he suffered a heart seizure all by himself in the middle of the Garden lobby. Mr. More implied that Wavy might have made up his story about the clubbing.

Wavy Gravy has enough incredible stories to tell without having to make up on was dreary as that. I think some of his "friends" ought to stop nervously insisting they had no connection with the incident, and start helping Wavy find out just who clubbed him, and start talking back to the musclemen in the rock business.

[Each weekday morning, we post an excerpt from another issue of the Voice, going in order from our oldest archives. Visit our Clip Job archive page to see excerpts back to 1956.]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

UCI Denies Team Pegasus Pro Continental License

The International Cycling Union (UCI) earlier today announced that Pegasus Sports will not receive a UCI Professional Continental license for 2011.

The team's status was in doubt after its major financial backer withdrew on the eve of the UCI's license application deadline, leaving the organization scrambling to find other sources of funding which would enable the team to compete in the 2011 season.

"We are shocked that the license was denied," Chris White, Pegasus Sports CEO commented.

"The team was already prepared for the 2011 season and we worked really hard after the news from last week. Significant cost reductions were made and additional sponsorship both from within our existing sponsor base and an external group was gathered, in order to stabilise the team financially in the short term," White continued.

White concluded "The people within the organisation were at the centre of this action and commitment, which is a real testament to the mateship within the team. We do not want to give up. The team is exploring whether there are other options for next year."

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Ice-Pick Bandit Was Just "Stressing" Over Christmas Gifts

39-year-old ?John Martinez, the accused "ice pick bandit" who was picked up in New Jersey after allegedly cornering and robbing at least six women in elevators in the Bronx's Co-op City and Manhattan's Stuyvesant Town, was indicted yesterday.
Today, the New York Post says Martinez (who prosecutors have called "a persistent violent felon") told the arresting officers he was "sick," while a cousin tells the Daily News he was just mugging people because he was stressed about buying Christmas gifts.?Because?nothing says "holiday cheer" like being threatened with an ice pick for your wallet. [SH]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Defense Lawyers Whine that DA's "Too Tough"

?Can you believe this!? Defense attorneys are complaining that Manhattan DA Cy Vance -- the guy whose job is, you know, to prosecute criminals -- is "too tough!" The Daily News interviewed a bunch of defense attorneys (but also some prosecutors!), who are whining that Vance is clogging the city's court system by refusing to hand out lenient plea deals and taking too many cases to trial. The gall!

One defense attorney told the News that "a lot of cases that should be settled are not getting settled," speculating that maybe the DA's office is refusing to plea bargain because they're bored (the county has filed 4% fewer felony cases this year).

But then another anonymous lawyer suggested that prosecutors might just be stupidly stubborn, citing a "big-time drug case" where the the DA had a "weak" case and refused to offer a plea deal. (The defendant was apparently acquitted.)

The hard-line approach, along with Vance's reported crackdown on serious misdemeanors and repeat offenses, has caused the number of courtroom trials to spike by a whopping 129 percent, which defense attorneys are complaining will jam the wheels of justice to a grinding halt.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Troy Donahue Explains Charlie Manson's Appeal: "His Cock."

?Clip Job: an excerpt every day from the Voice archives.
July 29, 1971, Vol. XVI, No. 30

Troy Donahue was always just like he is
By Ron Rosenbaum

Why interview Troy Donahue anyway?

"Believe me, you won't believe Toy when you see him," the press agent tells me. "He's a bearded hippie! And believe me he is fantastic in this picture. He plays Charles Manson! Actually we can't call him Charles Manson because of the legal thing, but it's the Charles Manson story. Troy is this sex and drug crazed Jesus-type cult leader of a hippie commune who kills a pregnant actress and her Hollywood friends. You see the parallel?

"This is going to be a very big picture. I have a feeling this is going to be bigger than 'Love Story.'"

And if that's not enough, the press agent offers another enticement.

"Listen, we'll take you to lunch with Troy at the Top of the Sixes. You'll like the Top of the Sixes. They have steaks and seafood. Do you like steak?"

The press agent sets a date for the Top of the Sixes and promises to send me Troy's "bio." He tells me I will recognize him, the agent, "because I wear wild shirts and wide ties. But I guarantee you won't recognize Troy."

From the "Biography of Troy Donahue" received special delivery the next day:

"Troy Donahue returns to the screen as Moon, the passion-possessed leader of a vengeful hippie cult...in this poignant, moving drama which is inspired by the awesome series of events surrounded the Sharon Tate murder case and other related wanton killings this decade."

Enclosed with the bio is a newspaper story headlined "Troy Donahue Now Bearded Hippie." The story features before and after photos of Troy, showing him as sunny angelic Sandy Winfield II of Warner Brothers' "Surfside 6" and then as sullen demonic "Moon." A note from the press agent attached to the story states: "This Associated Press story on the 'new' Troy Donahue appeared not only in the Sunday New Jersey Bergen Record but in countless other major Sunday newspapers in the nation."

* * *

Troy is dressed in white. White sneakers, white Levis, white t-shirt, white Levi jacket. A silver crucifix and some other trinkets hang from a chain around his neck.

Troy is a large man and his white clothes look a little too small for him, as if he doesn't want to admit he has put on weight. He looks like those one-time slim and healthy California surfers who grow older, grow paunchy -- and maybe a little punchy too -- and turn into bikers or dopers or both. There are gray hairs scattered through Troy's blond beard, and tiny red crinkles of visible veins on his cheeks. Troy is 35.

I'll never forget Troy's first words to me, when he stepped over his motorcycle helmet to greet me at his table at the Top of the Sixes. This is a literal transcription:

"Hey brother. Dig the scene. Dig the scene. Wow man. Dig the scene."

IF I had any doubts left that Troy was in fact a bearded hippie, he set them at rest when he twisted the conventional handshake I had offered into an interesting version of the Movement "power" grip, and concluded the greeting by saying, "Yeah. Dig the scene." Just us hippies together.

Well, there were two others waiting at Troy's table in addition to us hippies. There was the Press Agent, in a wild shirt and a wide tie, and Bob Roberts, the producer of "Sweet Savior," Troy's Charles Manson movie.

"Don't sit next to them," Troy told me. "Sit over here next to me so we can really rap."

When I am seated and turn to Troy, I find we are looking into each other's eyes. The heavy gaze continues in silence until Troy breaks it off, and nods slowly. "Yeah. Right," he says with finality.

We begin to talk about Charles Manson.

"I knew the dude," Troy tells me. "I used to play volleyball with him on the beach at L.A. years ago. He had short hair back then, but even then he was very big with the chicks."

What was his secret, I asked.

"It was his cock," says Troy.

"His cock?"

"His cock."

Before I could ask Troy for more details the press agent interrupts.

"Of course the film is not completely about Charles Manson. We have Troy there at the scene to commit the murder himself while Manson didn't do it himself. We rented a whole mansion in Teaneck, New Jersey, for the murder scene. The script was written by a Pulitzer prize winner, although under a pseudonym. Troy's performance is going to shock people. I think it's an Oscar performance although the Academy would never have the guts to give it to him."

Troy talks about his role:

"It was a bad scene man," says Troy to me. "It was real. You know, but it was dirty. I felt dirty man, evil. But it had to be done. But it's real. Death is real. Wow. Down there just a few blocks away they killed, what's his name. Joe Columbo. That's heavy. It's funny. Sitting here and talking when it's so real out there. Last night I'm with this black girl in a bar. Beautiful girl, and I'm sitting next to her just wanting to get my cock into her, and she turns to me and says, 'You know the guy who killed Columbo is black. You know what that means.' That's heavy man. That's real."

"I would make a prediction right now," producer Bob Roberts declares in the silence that follows. "I would predict there would be more murders. This Manson thing will be just the beginning. This movie is not about an isolated incident, it's about what's to come. And there will be more murders."

The press agent looks over at me nervously, then back at the producer: "Bob, maybe you shouldn't predict murders. Maybe you should change that to tragedies." He turns to me. "Say that Bob feels that this is a movie about a tragedy which may not, let's see, which may not be the last of its kind."

"But I think there will be murders too," says Bob a little disconsolately. "I'm willing to be quoted as predicting murders."

"I just don't think it's a good idea," says the press agent.

"Shut up! You don't know anything," Troy tells the press agent.

"That's nice," the press agent says with some dignity. There is an embarrassed silence at the table.

"Oh hey man, I'm just kidding. Here." Troy reaches for the press agent's hand, takes it into a firm "power" grip, looks him in the eye. "Brothers. Right?" The press agent nods dubiously.

Troy gets back on the subject of Charles Manson and begins explaining how Manson either was or wasn't just like Hitler.

"So I said to David Frost, I said, 'Did Hitler do it? I mean did he? He didn't. Man, Hitler didn't do it. You know what I mean?' And Frost looks at me and says: 'He didn't do it?' And I said, 'No man, he didn't do it, did he?' It blew Frost's mind. All he could say was 'He didn't do it?'"

Troy looks at me. "But the thing is he really did do it. Can you dig it? He did do it."

"Do what?" I asked.

"I think it's more than Hitler," said the producer before Troy can respond. "It's not just Hitler. It's the beautiful people."

"Right on," says Troy softly.

"The Beautiful People," repeats the producer. "I don't want people to get the idea this is an anti-hippie movie, because it really portrays the degeneracy and depravity of the beautiful people as well as the hippies. That whole Hollywood scene."

"That's right man," says Troy. "I know that scene. I've been there. It's these people man. It's a thrill to cruise the Strip and pick up some groovy looking hippies and take them home and play with them. Play with them. You know what I mean. Games, dig it. People playing with people. That's what they were all into. I was there when it happened."

"You were there?"

I wasn't there in person but I was there. You dig it. I was there. We were all there."

"I'll tell you one thing," says the press agent, breaking in on Troy's reverie. "This movie is going to polarize. I mean that. It's going to polarize this country. That why it's going to be so big. I would not be surprised if it isn't bigger than 'Love Story' and one reason will be because of this polarization."

Troy is still there. "I was there. You were there. We were all there," he tells us. "I was sitting just a few yards down in the canyon when it happened. I could feel it happen. It was like a warning."

I asked Troy if it was hard on him personally trying to play Charles Manson on the screen.

"No man. I'm just an actor."

"Wait till you see his performance. It's an Oscar winner," said the press agent.

But how had he been able to get into the Manson part? Had he done acid?

"I took acid man. I took acid and I met The Man. I met The Man. And The Man said cool it."

"Cool it?"

"Cool it. That's what he said. I was with these doctors, and...now you know some people take 250, 350 mikes and play around and think they did acid. But did acid. I was with these doctors in Miami and I was standing by this metal railing watching the ocean and all of a sudden there was a thunderstorm man, like the end of the world. And lightning, man. So I'm holding on and this lightning hits the railing, comes right along to me and right through me. I should have been fried, man. Then I knew. Cool it. That's what the Man was saying. Cool it."

"Troy's still big with the women though," the producer interjects. "I don't know how he does it. Have you got that set up with the girl in the hotel, Troy, this afternoon? You do, don't you? I don't know how he keeps going."

Troy points to his crotch and grins. "The day I stop going here is the day I stop going. Going to see" (a black singer) "tonight. Wow."

The press agent takes out some glossy pictures.

There is Troy in shoulder length hair, parted blond beard, and black leather jacket leaning familiarly on the shoulder of a stout pregnant woman.

"She plays the Sharon Tate type," the press agent explains. "And the amazing thing is she was really pregnant during the shooting. Isn't that something?"

He takes out another glossy and there's Troy in a shot from one of his Warner Brothers-Connie Stevens movies, a blond wave in his neatly parted hair, wearing a neat sweater and sportshirt.

"And here's Troy before. You could use these as before and after pictures."

"Yeah, but that's bullshit," says Troy. "That 'before and after' thing is bullshit. I was always the way I am now. See that picture of me with my hands in my pockets, looking so clean cut? You know what I've got in my pocket. You know what?"

I shake my head no.

Troy gives me a sly look, puts two fingers up to his mouth, and takes an imaginary drag on an imaginary joint. "You know what I'm talking about now? That's right," he says with satisfaction.

Our conversation is interrupted by three elderly ladies who have come over from a nearby table to ask for Troy's autograph.

"I can't believe it. The women still recognize him everywhere," the press agent says.

Troy flirts graciously with the ladies who say they want the autographs for their nieces and granddaughters. When they leave to return to their table, Troy turns to me.

"Crazy. Aren't they great. Wow. Look at those heavy legs." He smacks his lips. "Wouldn't you like to mow their lawns?"

"Troy, you have a 2.30 appointment at that hotel, don't you? I don't believe this guy and his women."

Troy wants to finish explaining how there was never any before and after.

"I was always like this, man. All I want in life is maybe three drinks and like half a joint" -- he takes another drag from his imaginary joint -- "and then I hop on my bike and I'm off. That's the real Troy Donahue you know. It's because I'm spontaneous. Spontaneous, man. I'm so spontaneous I could cry. Sometimes I go to movies and just cry. Listen, have you got any more questions? Anything else you want to know?"

"What about the crucifix you're wearing around your neck," I ask him. "How much does it mean to you?"

"Listen man, I'm not into any cults or anything. I don't believe in cults. Look, it's not just the crucifix. That's for my Man, but I've also got this Hebrew letter here, it's a Hebrew letter here, it's a Hebrew symbol, I don't know what it stands for but it's good to have. Then I've got this little Buddha figure here and, dig this, he's got one ear missing which is very heavy. You know what that means don't you? Then this thing here, this is just a piece of junk to remind me of the junk in the world."

Troy gets up to leave. He picks up his motorcycle helmet and takes out of it a shiny white package which had been stuffed inside.

"You want to see junk. Look at this. Somebody up at the Warner Brothers promo office laid this on me."

He hands me a package which turns out to be a white t-shirt with three bright red roses emblazoned on the front. Superimposed over the roses in large jolly letters is the word "JUNK." Below that are the words "Dusty and Sweets McGee," the title of Warner Brothers' newly released junkie movie.

"You can have that if you want," Troy tells me.

I thank Troy but decline.

"Well, I'm off on my cycle now man. Wish I had one of these" -- he takes a final drag on his imaginary joint. "Listen, are you really gonna write this up? You really are. Wow. You know if you do, you know that before and after shit -- it's been done before man. It's not me. I was always just like I am man."

[Each weekday morning, we post an excerpt from another issue of the Voice, going in order from our oldest archives. Visit our Clip Job archive page to see excerpts back to 1956.]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Monday, December 20, 2010

Rightbloggers on DADT: A Slow March Toward Tolerance, With Side Trips to Insanity

tomt200.jpgThis weekend the Senate repealed Don't Ask Don't Tell -- the 17-year-old policy that allowed gays to serve in the U.S. military only if they could conceal their sexual orientation. The bill awaits Obama's signature.

You might expect rightbloggers to be angry about it, and some of them are -- hilariously so. But homophobia isn't what it used to be (that is, it's not as popular) so some have gotten with the new gay wave, while others resort to a softer, more passive-aggressive approach.

Their behavior gives a little clue as to who's really running the right-wing show these days.

Let's start with the refuseniks. Generally, the less lunatic rightbloggers went gently with the sad news, leaving the outrage to their readers. Weasel Zippers, for instance, got in and out fast ("DADT Repealed 65-31, Armed Forces hardest hit..."), but his commenters were far more voluble ("We are Rome and we are burning," "The problem is, you know how flamboyant these sorts of people are. Yeah, I said these sorts..." "Okay, what happens if a dyke lesbian insists on staying with the guys, and fighting as a man?" etc).

"If only the President was this committed to fighting the war in Afghanistan to a successful conclusion," bemoaned This Ain't Hell. Dan Riehl said he wasn't "much of a culture warrior and "I haven't paid much attention to this issue," then made a bunch of gay jokes ("Do military uniforms allow for cross-dressing, by the way?"). Stop The ACLU published the names of "The 8 Republican RINOs that voted for repeal."

Kevin McCullough had questions. For one: "How can you possibly be allowing for the flamboyancy of effeminate male soldiers to engage in sexual conduct and their notorious ever wandering lust for the new on one hand, and hold court martial for those who have discreetly hidden their sexual escapades while destroying their families?" We're sure DoD is working on it.

At The Astute Bloggers Alec Rawls -- best known for his tireless efforts to expose the proposed United 93 Memorial in Pennsylvania as a secret tribute to radical Islam -- applied his fertile imagination to the newly-gay military. At present, Rawls argued, military personnel serving overseas don't have many sexual opportunities, which made him proud: "Heterosexual young men are willing to join the military and put their sex lives on hold," he explained, "because the manliness of fighting for their nation makes the lack of access to females bearable."

?But "if a subculture of active homosexuality is allowed to burst out and grow amidst the suppressed heterosexuality of our military," Rawls added, look out: military service will become "a gauntlet of having to abide whatever in-your-face homosexuality the flamers want to throw up," like Tailhook, only gay and 24/7. This, Rawls predicted, "will be a death sentence for heterosexual recruiting." See how you like your all-gay armed forces, America!

Another big-picture thinker, Jane Jamison, identified herself to readers of Right Wing News as a "heterosexual conservative" who lives in the "very liberal San Francisco area," where she has been able to observe the gay menace at close hand. For example, "God forbid you happen into San Francisco by accident during the 'Bay to Breakers' race," she wrote, "you and the kids will see naked gay sex acts on the sidewalk with police standing by watching." Along with this travel tip, Jamison revealed that "there can be dire consequences for being unabashedly heterosexual" -- for example, "being 'homophobed,'" which sounds unpleasant.

Based of her experience, Jamison has determined that "repeal of DADT is just one more progressive step to shrink our defenses and weaken us in the world. That long-term goal has only a little to do with gays, but they are useful tools for now. Gay soldiers are just one way to create chaos and distraction and eventually end our military."

Jamison found relevance to this charge in the case of reportedly gay WikiLeaks soldier Pvt. Bradley Manning. She riffed off a post at Gay Patriot, which actually supported repeal on security grounds, that "gays have been lying for years to get hired into military jobs, and knowingly setting themselves up to be bribed by people who would do this country harm. What is patriotic about that? This is similar to the argument about amnesty for illegal aliens." She also read the Gay Patriot post to mean that "the gay community has been committing an 'extortion' against America - legalize us or we will keep joining the military and doing what we can on the inside to jeopardize the system." Also, gays will usher in "shariah law," but they'll have a hard time with those radical Islamists once they take over, etc.

Deebow of the milblog Blackfive found the news that the military will probably "'expressly prohibit' heterosexuals from using separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from homosexuals" as proof that "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder... I am pretty certain that if I have to live in the same BEQ room with two other guys, who happen to be gay, I am nigh on to convinced that there are going to be, um... issues."

Disappointingly, Deebow didn't follow up on this speculative fiction opening, but did tell us that "even though it is the military, there are things you still can't make service members think or do" -- like accept gay people as comrades in arms. "I think the 'giant sucking sound' that America is about to hear," he added, "comes from the members of our military who are going to be leaving... So libturds, you might think that you have given us a kinder gentler military that is more fashion conscious and sensitive. All you did today was weaken a country." Deebow also quoted Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men, presumedly for added authority.

At The American Spectator, W. James Antle III said that while DADT was "flawed and unstable," it had attempted "to balance two competing realities: Many individual homosexuals serve honorably and effectively in the miltary even as, all other things being equal, open homosexuality as such is a disruptive force... Now instead of trying to avoid the incidence of sexual attraction within the armed forces, there will have to be myriad rules and regulations trying to cope with its consequences."

If you think this argument is flawed because heterosexual women serve with men in the military without much difficulty, you should know Antle doesn't approve of that either. "...introducing into the military women as a group ensured that some of the women will inevitably be attracted to some of the men (and vice versa) over time... DADT repeal ensures that this element of sexual attraction and tension will be repeated in still more intimate settings and in combat situations." So the trouble all really started with the Women's Army Auxiliary Corps, or perhaps Florence Nightingale.

Ah, such larks. But there were rightblogger repeal supporters, and those whose position might best be described as Tolerant, But With An Explanation.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

The Dangers of Going Viral: Kidney Donor Attacked by Reddit For Plugging Charity

?In the span of one week, a user of the highly influential social news website Reddit, a man who goes by the internet handle BadgerMatt, experienced the extreme highs and lows of going viral. At a moment when the internet's nerdiest, and often ugliest, underbelly is gaining mainstream attention -- from 4chan's antics, both sour and sweet, to the giant Gawker hack to Anonymous' targeting of Scientology -- BadgerMatt's tale encompasses it all: the power of a crowd, "vigilante e-justice," piles of goodwill and then -- just like that -- how quickly the hive mind can turn on you, leading to harassment and threats. His whole story is below.

It all started with a posting on eBay. Matt sold four tickets he couldn't use for a bid of $600, but the woman backed out, refusing to pay, and it was too late for Matt to resell. He was left in a lurch, angry and decided to scam the woman who screwed him over. Pretending to be a third party, Matt anonymously emailed the woman saying he noticed she won an auction and eventually decided on giving her $1,100 for the tickets. She agreed, contacted Matt (not knowing he was on both ends of the deal) and eventually paid him the $600. When she tried to arrange to meet the third party (also Matt) for the $1,100, he stood her up. Predictably, she flipped out. Matt posted his whole tale to Reddit and the story went viral (and so on).

The spread of Matt's story shows the power of Reddit -- and similar sites like Digg and, tangentially, 4chan -- where a compelling tale can take off, resulting in loads of attention, back-patting and vindication.

Riding high on his sudden burst of online fame, and recognizing the power of a site like Reddit, Matt attempted to make the best of the eyes on him and added a link at the bottom of his initial Reddit post to JustGive.org, in order to donate to the American Cancer Society. "My father-in-law has cancer so I thought it'd be neat to use the publicity from the story to drum up donations in his name," Matt explained to Runnin' Scared. "I got $218 and was thrilled."

Then he attempted to repeat his viral success. Under the headline "My story as an anonymous kidney donor and my plea for your help," Matt told the story of his own kidney donation to solicit for more for the American Cancer Society. "I wrote out my experience (it was filled with medical complications) and made my request for charity. Everything was going perfectly," he said. "I was answering a lot of good questions and people seemed interested. The post included actual pictures of my kidney in the operating room, my open wound from a second surgery because of an infection and my current scar."

But someone got suspicious. Some Reddit users, most of whom have since deleted all of their posts on the matter, questioned Matt's story and wondered if he was pocketing the donations, despite the link directly to the ACS. Despite a huge wave of positive reactions, Reddit works on a voting system and the disbelievers picked up steam. Then it started to get scary.

"A few individuals then started calling me at home and hanging up," said Matt. "People were sending me messages telling me to die and that I was a crook, a scammer and scum. I had a family member who was called and harassed." An additional Reddit post, entitled "DO NOT DONATE TO THE KIDNEY PERSON. IT IS FAKE," became the most popular post on the website. (The content of that post has since been deleted.)

"I had dozens of private messages telling me how horrible of a person I was and that I should be killed," said Matt. Voicemails suggested Matt would go "straight to hell for stealing from good people." Another said: "Fuck you, you piece of shit." Matt was then banned from commenting on his original Reddit post.

In order to explain, Matt started a new thread called "Redeeming Myself." He then piled on more proof: "I took pictures of numerous documents related to my donation last August including lab reports, letters confirming my surgery date, pictures from the scope inside my body, and a picture of the bloody wound vac I was attached to for 3 weeks."

The post claiming fraud changed its tune: "Looks like it's real after all. Sorry about that," read the update.

"People began apologizing at that point," said Matt. But not everyone: the user who started the witch hunt sent Matt a message reading, "Sorry, but it's not that big of a deal, it's just the internet." Cue the talk about online accountability.

Some harassing phone calls kept coming, but the goodwill came back in a big way. "I did well with donations after that," said Matt. One person donated $782 to get
him to the $1,000 mark. When he hit $1,300, an attorney in Texas donated $3,700 to reach $5,000.

"It's pretty cool," said Matt. You can donate here.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Losing Satchmo and Jim Morrison The Same Week

?Clip Job: an excerpt every day from the Voice archives.
July 15, 1971, Vol. XVI, No. 28

Jim Morrison
By Don Heckman

It was another one of those times, last week. In one day the papers reported the deaths of Louis Armstrong, jazz trumpeter Charlie Shavers, and rock star Jim Morrison.

Only the Morrison death came as a shocker. And even that produced only a peculiar sense of deja vu. Rock has followed closely on the heels of jazz as a highly lethal profession. When one hears of the death of a performer of Morrison's stature, the reaction is more one of curiosity than surprise. What happened this time? Was it an accident? Was it suicide? And the inevitable: were drugs involved?

In Morrison's case, the manner in which the announcement was made, nearly a week after his burial in France, aroused predictable suspicions. Add the fact that Morrison was a figure of considerable controversy, and a first class rumor situation has been created.

Ultimately, however, the circumstances are irrelevant. Morrison is gone, and it seems obvious that his particular public significance was as a visible symbol of some ideas whose time had come. His cry, "We
the world and we want it now," was a rallying point for a generation that had more self-confidence, more arrogance, and more visibility than any which had preceded it. And Morrison's insistence upon public displays of what always struck me as rather adolescent sexuality were timed right to correspond with the brouhaha over censorship laws. He was no Lenny Bruce, but in his own way, Morrison did his bit.

His music (and the Doors were quintessentially a reflection of his aesthetic profile) was rudimentary and gutsy at a time when audiences wanted rudimentary, gutsy music. His singing, storytelling, and wailing were virtual predecessors of the primal scream, and his stage movements were visible evidence of the new physicality that dominated the pop music of the late '60s.

But, as with Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin, Morrison was confronting a new decade, a changing generation, some markedly different musical styles, and -- most important -- his own aging. In reference to this, I was fascinated by a story in the Times on Sunday about Dr. Herbert L. Klemme at the Menninger Foundation. Dr. Klemme has been formulating a concept of adult development which suggests that "The transition from young adulthood to mature adulthood is equal in difficulty to any other period of transition in the growth and development of people." The transition from what is called "alloplastic mastery" to "autoplastic mastery" roughly defines the change from "mastery over the external world" to "inward self-mastery." The difficulty in moving from the outward focus, with its attendant financial and public rewards to the more introspective satisfactions of the stage of "autoplastic mastery" can create genuine crisis conditions. In some people they can result in a reversion to early "safer" behavioral patterns; in other cases they can result in high risk behavior, and such escape mechanisms as drugs and alcohol.

Whether or not all of this applies to Morrison -- or Hendrix or Joplin -- is a matter which would require a more personal knowledge than I have. But the potential applicability of Klemme's ideas are, nonetheless, worth considering. The history of American popular arts is littered with the shadows of performers -- Rudolph Valentino, Jean Harlow, Larry Hart, Charlie Parker, etc. -- who never quite made it past the first rush of public acclaim. Jim Morrison is the most recent example, but you can be he won't be the last.

[Each weekday morning, we post an excerpt from another issue of the Voice, going in order from our oldest archives. Visit our Clip Job archive page to see excerpts back to 1956.]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Sunday, December 19, 2010

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is Dead After 65-31 Vote to Repeal Policy

?As expected, the repeal of the Clinton-era "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy banning gays in the military has passed the Senate by a vote of 65-31. President Obama must now sign the bill into law, which he is expected to do. On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted to overturn the ban 250 to 175. "Today, America lived up to its highest ideals of freedom and equality. Congress recognized that all men and women have the right to openly serve their country," said the president of the Human Rights Campaign. Finally. [CNN]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Spanish Olympic Official: Alberto Contador Should Get Maximum Ban if He Doped

Cycling News

Spanish Olympic Official: Alberto Contador Should Get Maximum Ban if He Doped

By AP, with additional commentary by Roadcycling.com
Dec 16, 2010 - 3:30:02 PM

Pro road cyclist Alberto Contador and track athletes involved in Operation Galgo should receive maximum bans if they are found guilty of doping, Spanish Olympic Committee president Alejandro Blanco said Thursday.

Contador is facing a two-year ban and being stripped of his third Tour de France title after failing a doping test during this year's Tour de France. Fourteen people are implicated in Galgo, including world steeplechase champion Marta Dominguez.

"In the case of Contador and any other athletes - maximum sanction when we know" if they are guilty, Blanco said in an interview and added "When it's proven an athlete has doped, there is no debate - authorities need to act."

While all results are usually annulled and prize money can be paid back with a doping sanction, Blanco was also open to the suggestion that Spanish athletes pay back grants earned from the state to assist in training.

"If they are shown to be guilty then there's no debate, they have to return everything," Blanco said from COE's Madrid headquarters. "Take away the grant and, even, try to make them pay back the money."

Despite backing Contador after news of his failed test, Blanco dismissed any notion the Spanish cyclist would get preferential treatment after the cycling federation's president also came out in support. Contador tested positive for clenbuterol, which he has blamed on contaminated meat.

"Until it is proven that an athlete has doped, you can't criticize the athlete," Blanco said. "There is not a single doubt over the ability of our disciplinary committees in any Spanish federation. They respect the rules in that sense, so people can rest assured."

Blanco was concerned over the fallout of Galgo, a Spanish Civil Guard investigation, which has divided Spanish track and field and accused Dominguez of being a supplier of performance-enhancing drugs. But he didn't expect recent scandals to affect the country's sports image as it considers bids to host the 2020 or 2024 Games.

Madrid lost to London for 2012 and Rio de Janeiro for 2016. Barcelona and Zaragoza are considering bids for the 2022 Winter Games.

Blanco insisted Spain was at the forefront of the battle on doping.

"Nobody fights against doping more than Spain does," he said.

Related articles

Spanish Olympic Official: Alberto Contador Should Get Maximum Ban if He Doped - Dec 16, 2010 - 3:30:02 PM
UCI President Pat McQuaid Comments on Alberto Contador Case and Says EPO Bans Should Be 4 Years - Dec 13, 2010 - 11:34:49 AM
Italy Pushing for Doping Ban for Entire Cycling Family - Dec 11, 2010 - 12:29:25 AM
Lawyers Use Cocaine Defense in Alberto Contador Doping Case - Dec 7, 2010 - 8:02:30 AM
UCI to Increase Anti-Doping Controls in 2011 - Dec 4, 2010 - 1:02:10 AM
Floyd Landis Says Clenbuterol Use Widespread in Cycling - Nov 30, 2010 - 5:15:40 AM
Alberto Contador Submits Official Defense Documents in Doping Case - Nov 26, 2010 - 2:40:12 PM
Alberto Contador Contends Innocence - Nov 26, 2010 - 1:29:02 AM

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Julian Assange Rape Allegations Revealed in Detail

?The confusion about what charges exactly have lead to the extradition hearings against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange reached a fever pitch this week with Michael Moore and Keith Olbermann both coming under fire for perpetuating the much bandied about myth that only a "broken condom" is responsible for the "sex by surprise" charges that Assange faces in Sweden. Now, the Guardian is detailing the charges for the first time, after receiving "unauthorised access" to police files.

From the Guardian, via Gawker, comes the story of one accuser, known as Miss A:

The allegations centre on a 10-day period after Assange flew into Stockholm on Wednesday 11 August. One of the women, named in court as Miss A, told police that she had arranged Assange's trip to Sweden, and let him stay in her flat because she was due to be away. She returned early, on Friday 13 August, after which the pair went for a meal and then returned to her flat.

Her account to police, which Assange disputes, stated that he began stroking her leg as they drank tea, before he pulled off her clothes and snapped a necklace that she was wearing. According to her statement she "tried to put on some articles of clothing as it was going too quickly and uncomfortably but Assange ripped them off again". Miss A told police that she didn't want to go any further "but that it was too late to stop Assange as she had gone along with it so far", and so she allowed him to undress her.

According to the statement, Miss A then realised he was trying to have unprotected sex with her. She told police that she had tried a number of times to reach for a condom but Assange had stopped her by holding her arms and pinning her legs. The statement records Miss A describing how Assange then released her arms and agreed to use a condom, but she told the police that at some stage Assange had "done something" with the condom that resulted in it becoming ripped, and ejaculated without withdrawing.

Miss A told a friend it was "the worst sex ever" and, "Not only had it been the world's worst screw, it had also been violent."

After a night of sex with another woman, in which Assange allegedly resisted wearing a condom again, Miss W alleges:

[S]he had gone to buy breakfast before getting back into bed and falling asleep beside Assange. She had awoken to find him having sex with her, she said, but when she asked whether he was wearing a condom he said no. "According to her statement, she said: 'You better not have HIV' and he answered: 'Of course not,' " but "she couldn't be bothered to tell him one more time because she had been going on about the condom all night. She had never had unprotected sex before."

Assange has not been formally charged with a crime, but expect the stories of his accusers to spread wildly, hopefully correcting the public record, not in reference to his guilt or innocence, but at least when it comes to the accusations he's facing.

That said, online daters beware.

10 days in Sweden: the full allegations against Julian Assange [Guardian via Gawker]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Gawker Launching New Blog in Response to Massive Gnosis Hack

Thomas Plunkett, Gawker Media's chief technology officer, announced yesterday in a staff memo that the company will be launching "a public Gawker Tech & Product blog," which he called "a long time coming." Slated for early next week, the new blog "will communicate product information as well as product plans to our readers." Plunkett's extensive memo,

, including its source code, internal communications and commenter passwords and email addresses. Plunkett calls the site's response "inadequate" and writes that he and his team were "unprepared to handle this eventuality." Full text of the memo after the jump.

Plunkett is also highly critical of himself, admitting "numerous wrong decisions were made by me this past weekend in responding to the security breach." In conclusion, he writes: "You can also expect a much more public me -- if there is one critical thing that has been missing, it is a lack of consistent communication from me. That will change."

From: Thomas Plunkett Subject: The Gawker Media security breach -- status and moving forward To: [Gawker staff] Date: Friday, December 17, 2010, 4:43 PM

Everyone -

As you know, this has been the Gawker tech team's most difficult week ever. This note has been too long coming, but the following is meant to communicate several things: what happened, our current activities, and our plans for moving forward. I suggest you read all of this as I am making several recommendations below, and we are implementing some changes that will affect all of you.

What Happened
Gawker Media servers and some company email accounts were compromised by hackers at some time during the last few weeks; the compromise was made public to us (and everyone else) this past weekend. In recent weeks, intruders were able to gain access to our web servers by exploiting a vulnerability in our source code, allowing them to gain access to user data and passwords. With this information, they were able to gain access to the editor wiki, some Gawker Media email accounts, and other external resources.

It is clear that the Gawker tech team did not adequately secure our platform from an attack of this nature. We were also not prepared to respond when it was necessary. These things can be attributed to several factors.

First, we never planned for such an event, and therefore had no systems, or processes in place to adequately respond. Our focus as a team (and company) has been on moving forward. This put up blinders on several fronts. As a result, numerous wrong decisions were made by me this past weekend in responding to the security breach.

Further, attention to completed work is every bit as important as attention to upcoming work. Our development efforts have been focused on new product while committing relatively little time to reviewing past work. This is often a fatal mistake in software development and was central to this vulnerability.

Finally, we have not only seen tremendous growth as a company, we have never been afraid to take an unpopular or controversial stance with regard to individuals or organizations. Let's face it: we draw the ire of many. This creates a unique set of demands to meet rapid growth as well as threats that often specifically target us. We did not establish standards and practices to handle growth and the fact that we have a target on our back.

On several fronts -- technically, as well as customer support and communication -- we found ourselves unprepared to handle this eventuality. The tech team should have been better prepared, committed more time to perform thorough audits, and grown our team's technical expertise to meet our specific business needs. As a result of not having done these things, we have not adhered to standards expected of us, and our response was inadequate. The remedy to this situation will not be immediate, but it will be swift as possible.

Current Activity: Regaining Control
The tech team have moved our operation to the third floor of the Gawker Media office in order to focus on the work that needs to be done. We are currently in the process of performing a complete review of what happened with an independent security firm.

Here's what we've done so far to regain control:

We have been able to establish a fairly complete timeline of intrusion activity, and have identified compromised assets within Gawker. We have re-established control of compromised systems including our Google Apps accounts. As a result, you will have to reconfigure your Google Apps access (more on this below).

In addition, we have addressed all known vulnerabilities and will continue auditing our system for security flaws, and we have made appropriate changes to administrative accounts to our web and application infrastructure. There are many people reviewing our code base, and because of this, we will also reach out to members of the technical community to harness their expertise. This process will continue as we move to an entirely new, hardened web infrastructure.

We have introduced a help desk to address commenter concerns related to the breach. This will continue to exist as long as it is needed. Scott, Greg, Jeremy, Nick and a host of interns, and many of you, have been active in the threads, and communicating as much as possible as we work through this event.

Moving Forward
We've learned many lessons from this experience, both as a tech team, as a company, and as individuals. If there's one lesson nearly all of us learned, it's that we can and must be smarter with passwords. Lifehacker is a great resource for password advice (and there are many others). I suggest you start here: http://lifehacker.com/184773/geek-to-live-choose-and-remember-great-passwords.

Efffective immediately, we have enabled SSL, a more secure method of communicating over the internet, for all users with Gawker Media accounts on Google Apps (this does not affect your personal Gmail). Those of you not using web-based Gmail will have to reconfigure your clients (this includes any desktop mail client as well as other devices). The attached document provides instructions to make this easier, and includes information to configure different devices including iPhone, Android and Blackberry phones.

Also effective immediately: If you require access to sensitive materials (legal, financial, or accounting documents) on Google Docs, you must have two-factor authentication setup on your account. No documents will be shared with personal Gmail accounts. We are also strongly encouraging all staff to setup two-factor authorization even if you do not require access to sensitive material.

We will enforce a policy that sensitive information not be posted to the editor wiki. This policy will also apply to chat communications (e.g., Campfire, AIM).

On all of our sites, we will be introducing several new features to our commenting system to acknowledge the reality that we have lost the commenters' trust and don't deserve it back. We should not be in the business of collecting and storing personal information, and our objective is to migrate our platform away from any personal data dependencies (like email & password). We will push further integration of external account verification sources using OAuth (like Facebook, Twitter, and Google) for those that want to use them, and we'll also be introducing disposable accounts. Disposable accounts are similar to the service a pre-paid phone offers to drug dealers (a disposable, untraceable communication device). Commenters seeking anonymity will be able to do so confident that when necessary they can simply toss out the account and there will be no connection to the individual. They will work like this:
- no password will be stored
- no email will be stored
- account can be used as long as you have the key code; lose or delete it, the account is abandoned.

In addition, we are establishing a public Gawker Tech & Product blog (a long time coming) from which we will communicate product information as well as product plans to our readers. You can expect to see it by early next week.

This has been a very unfortunate event in Gawker Media history, and we have learned much from it. Above all, this has been an enormous inconvenience for everyone affected, and for this I apologize. You can expect a much more responsive and proactive technology and product team for 2011. You can also expect a much more public me -- if there is one critical thing that has been missing, it is a lack of consistent communication from me. That will change.

Regards,

Tom Plunkett

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Friday, December 17, 2010

Notes From the UBS Bank Dress Code: The Most Amusing Bits

?Dress code? We haven't had a dress code since we quit Brownies. But some people do. Some people have to wear, for instance, those leg-compressing torture chambers known as pantyhose, or businessperson skirt and jacket or pants suits that never really smell fresh after the first wear, despite dry-cleaning. These people likely work at banks like UBS, which, via the Wall Street Journal, is sending a 43-page memo to its Swiss banking staff on how to dress to impress.

This is apparently part of a test to reestablish brand confidence and help with client relationships. Herewith, the best of the very thorough and somewhat personal instructions, with a certain amount of editorializing.

--Women should "wear their jackets buttoned" except when sitting, so as not to look totally uptight. They should also frequently touch up their roots if they color, as no one wants to see a female in decline. And no goth polish or "nail art" -- seriously, nail art?

--Men should "schedule barber appointments every four weeks to maintain your haircut shape," shave frequently, wear easily washable good quality underwear (really!), and also, use a "large hanger with rounded shoulders" to keep their suits looking manly under the duress of all these emasculating rules.

Via the Journal,

Male employees are also warned about using hair dyes to mask their advancing age, since the "artificial color contrasts excessively with the actual age of your skin."

For Everyone:
--NO garlic and onions, to avoid stank-breath.
--NO short socks that show your ankles -- they demonstrate weakness.
--NO short sleeves (molester-y) or cuff links (trying too hard)
--DEFINITELY NO "allowing underwear to be seen" (even if it is good quality!) or choosing a tie knot that does not enhance your face or body shape.
--DO wear a watch. Obviously, you're Swiss.

Really, this is just good advice for everybody. A tie knot that enhances an unfortunate body or face shape can be truly undermining.

If all goes well, the dress code may extend to all of the bank's branches in Switzerland.

[JDoll]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Don't Ask Don't Tell Repealed by House, Again

?The U.S. House of Representatives today voted 250 to 175 (almost straight down party lines) to repeal the ban on openly gay and lesbian soldiers in the U.S. military. This is the second time a repeal has been approved by the House. Previously it was repealed in connection with a defense spending bill, which stalled in the Senate a week ago.

Republicans voting against the bill argued it would put too great a burden on the military. And also, via CNN, that "The United States military is not the YMCA. It's something special," said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-California, who added, [this is] "a liberal crusade to create a utopia."

Two Republicans will need to join Democratic senators in approving the repeal for it to pass. While several Republicans have expressed support, they want more time to debate -- yet pushing the repeal through becomes less likely once the more conservative incoming Congress is seated the first week of January. The L.A. Times reports that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has "promised to bring the House bill to the Senate floor, suggesting he may keep lawmakers in session through the weekend and beyond."

[JDoll]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

The Last Show at the Fillmore

?Clip Job: an excerpt every day from the Voice archives.
July 1, 1971, Vol. XVI, No. 26

Fillmore, Summer of '71: Graduation Day
By Don Heckman

So it turned out to be with a whimper, after all. Expecting fireworks at the Absolutely Last Final Fillmore East performance on Sunday night, we experienced, instead, a strangely down drifting-off into nothingness. The week's hot rumors about superstar appearances and dynamite jams finally were dispelled around 2:30 a.m., when the Allman Brothers Band went on stage for the epitaph Fillmore set. The Beach Boys had been there, and Edgar Winter's White Trash, Mountain, Country Joe, Albert King, and the J. Geils Band. But McCartney and Lennon never made their predicted surprise appearance on stage; if Dylan was there only Al Aronowitz knew about it, and the rumors of Jagger's imminent arrival were too much to believe, in front.

The usual peripheral shit went down. Street people crowded the avenue outside, with a few heads getting busted; the Angels made a brief appearance. There was heavy tripping and a feeling of incipient violence in the air. At one point Bill Graham made an appeal to the audience to refrain from ripping off (literally) chairs, curtains, toilet seats, and everything else they could get their hands on. He insisted that the operation would be turned over to a new producer, but failed to confirm any of the rumors (more of them) about who the new buyer would be.

I suppose it was foolish to expect anything else. The Fillmore was born and bred to present rock music -- group music -- and that's precisely what it did, right up to its final exhausted gasp. Superstars -- apart from those with groups -- were never its thing, since the Fillmore, in both its manner of operation and its style of presentation, represented a visible manifestation of the possibility of Community. Community between audience and performers, between sellers and buyers, between the business world and the people. It didn't always work perfectly, but it came close enough to suggest that the sense of family which was a deep part of the relationship between the rock groups of the '60s and their audiences might have an appellation that would reach into wider cultural, political, and social areas.

Does the closing of the Fillmore tell us that the Community, we-can-be-together trip was a shuck? Do all those incredibly loving sentiments expressed on the stage of the Fillmore by the likes of David Crosby and Neil Young, B.B. King, Tina Turner, Gracie Slick, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jerry Garcia, Roland Kirk, etc., etc. imply that it's not going to work, that we can't be together, that the fate of this generation is going to be the sam as that of any other, despite the high-handed idealism of its music?

I don't know. I don't think anyone does. Nailed about the Fillmore stage Sunday night was a banner that read "Graduation June 1971." And maybe that was the key to it all. Maybe the closing of the Fillmore represents a symbolic graduation into the real world. Maybe the time has come translate the noble thoughts and phrases of the music into everyday action. Maybe the time to begin living, in our individual lives, the brotherhood and togetherness that was part of us as we sat in all the Fillmores of the '60s.

And then, on the other hand, maybe -- as Carole King sings -- "It's too late now." I hope not. I like to think that an old Chinese saying is more apropos to the closing of the Fillmore. It goes like this: "That every ending shall be a new beginning is the law of heaven."

[Each weekday morning, we post an excerpt from another issue of the Voice, going in order from our oldest archives. Visit our Clip Job archive page to see excerpts back to 1956.]

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Win the Ultimate Mountain Bike Christmas Giveaway

Cycling News

Win the Ultimate Mountain Bike Christmas Giveaway

By RoadCycling.com
Dec 13, 2010 - 3:17:01 PM

Click here to access the giveaway.

In this amazing giveaway one lucky cyclist will have the chance of winning a complete bike as CRC is giving away a Turner 5 Spot frame, Marzocchi 44 RC3 Ti forks, a DT Swiss EX1750 wheelset, Chromag: Fubars, Ranger Stem, Lynx DT Saddle and Seat Clamp, Hope Tech M4 183mm F and R Floating Rotors Braided Hoses, Schwalbe Nobby Nic 2.25 tyres, Continental Xking tyres, Wellgo MG1 Magnesium Pedals, North Shore Billet Disc Brake Adaptors, Renthal 34t Chainring, a set of Kore Torsion Riser Bars, an Elite Aheadset Stem and finally a set of ODI Lock On grips.

Click here to access the giveaway.

Related articles

Win the Ultimate Mountain Bike Christmas Giveaway - Dec 13, 2010 - 3:17:01 PM

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here